User agent | Browser Version | OS | Hardware Type |
---|---|---|---|
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/50.0.2661.95 Safari/537.36 Core/1.50.1659.400 QQBrowser/9.5.9769.400 | 9 | Windows | Computer |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/63.0.3239.26 Safari/537.36 Core/1.63.6823.400 QQBrowser/10.3.3082.400 | 10 | Windows | Computer |
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; MC003 Build/MC003; wv) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/77.0.3865.120 MQQBrowser/6.2 TBS/045514 Mobile Safari/537.36 | 6 | Android | Computer |
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 9; 16s Pro Build/PKQ1.190616.001; wv) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/77.0.3865.120 MQQBrowser/6.2 TBS/045513 Mobile Safari/537.36 MMWEBID/9326 MicroMessenger/7.0.22.1820(0x2700163B) Process/tools WeChat/arm64 Weixin NetType/4G Language/zh_CN ABI/arm64 | 6 | Android | Computer |
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; Mi 10 Pro Build/QKQ1.191117.002; wv) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/77.0.3865.120 MQQBrowser/6.2 TBS/045513 Mobile Safari/537.36 MMWEBID/3880 MicroMessenger/8.0.1840(0x28000039) Process/tools WeChat/arm64 Weixin NetType/WIFI Language/zh_CN ABI/arm64 | 6 | Android | Mi 10 Pro |
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 10; zh-cn; Mi9 Pro 5G Build/QKQ1.190825.002) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/77.0.3865.120 MQQBrowser/11.2 Mobile Safari/537.36 COVC/045517 | 11 | Android | Computer |
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; LIO-AN00 Build/HUAWEILIO-AN00; wv) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/77.0.3865.120 MQQBrowser/6.2 TBS/045513 Mobile Safari/537.36 MMWEBID/9334 MicroMessenger/8.0.1840(0x28000037) Process/tools WeChat/arm64 Weixin NetType/WIFI Language/zh_CN ABI/arm64 | 6 | Android | Mate 30 Pro |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/70.0.3538.25 Safari/537.36 Core/1.70.3861.400 QQBrowser/10.7.4313.400 | 10 | Windows | Computer |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/60.0.3112.101 Safari/537.36 QQBrowser/4.3.4986.400 | 4 | Mac | Computer |
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 10; zh-cn; SM-G986N Build/QP1A.190711.020) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/87.0.4280.101 MQQBrowser/11.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 | 11 | Android | GALAXY S20+ 5G |
2020 offers an interesting viewpoint to WebRTC browser support. Where exactly is it available in desktop and mobile, and what can you do about it as a developer?
This is almost a yearly article that I now write, each time with a slightly different focus to it. We're now halfway into 2020, and things are changing fast.
Here's a quote that I am seeing a lot this year:
It rings true for the last few weeks when it comes to WebRTC, but somehow, in the domain of WebRTC browser support, we're still standing in place.
My most up to date slide on WebRTC browser support?
Finally, you create QQ account successfully. If you don't know your QQ ID(QQ number), please check what's the difference between QQ ID, WeChat ID, and QQ email. So now, you can go back to use qq international on your phone. If you failed to sign up QQ. Chat with millions of new friends on QQ, now with HD video calls and live translation to 50 idioms. Massive chat rooms and users from all around the world. Chat with millions of new friends on QQ, now with HD video calls and live translation to 50 idioms. Massive chat rooms and users from all around the world. QQeStore.com is the No.1 and largest online shopping network in Brunei. QQ Browser 7.0 Preview (2012) In October 2012, the preview version of QQ Browser 7.0 was released on the Tencent Experience Center website and was open for testing. The QQ browser 7.0 preview version adopts the new version of the interface, and the brand is consistent with the mobile QQ Browser.
We will get back to it in detail a bit later.
For now I'd like to look at the 'Can I use' website, filtered for WebRTC. It gives a good starting point (although somewhat misleading). I will use that as the basis of looking at WebRTC on desktop and mobile.
WebRTC support on desktop
On the desktop today, all modern web browsers support WebRTC.
This has been the case for quite some time now. I've announced that this means that WebRTC is ready towards the end of 2018.
Why?
Because the consumption model in the desktop today is done through web applications, while on mobile, it is predominantly based on native applications. So the moment all desktop browsers are nicely represented and supported, things look bright.
This isn't to say that there aren't challenges with WebRTC browser support – obviously there are.
I can list a few of them here out of the top of my head:
- No support in Internet Explorer (and there won't be any for this dying browser)
- Edge still has its old version and the new Chromium based one. They behave differently, with the new Chromium one acting just like Chrome for anything WebRTC related
- Safari still suffers from its need to differentiate by not doing what other browsers are doing. It has no VP9 support, and it is still somewhat buggier than the rest of the crowd
- Things like hardware acceleration support and proper rendering, antivirus CPU issues and CPU consumption in general still plague the main implementation (=Chrome) today
WebRTC support on mobile
When it comes to mobile, support for WebRTC is a bit more complicated.
Qq Mobile Browser App
WebRTC iOS Safari support
iOS Safari has been supporting WebRTC since Safari 11.
We're now in Safari 13.5 and things are still rather grim when it comes to true support of WebRTC. Download winrar offline installer 64 bit.
iOS Safari WebRTC is such a broken mess that my going suggestion to clients unfortunately is to not support it and redirect users to a native app installation. I had to manually go through all open WebRTC bugs in webkit to figure out how to explain this to my clients and help them in reaching that conclusion and even conveying that to their customers.
There are nasty bugs in iOS Safari that have been opened since 2019 or earlier relating to media handling of WebRTC. These aren't just edge cases, but rather things you'll have users bump into in regular use. Some of them have finally been fixed in the latest 13.5.5 beta earlier this month.
Oh – and if you plan on using any OTHER browser on iOS then WebRTC won't be supported there. Why? Because Apple hasn't made WebRTC available in its Webkit Webview on iOS and they aren't allowing anyone to build a mobile iOS browser that doesn't use Webkit as its rendering engine. So much for freedom and choice.
Up until now, there was no serious way to run a WebRTC web application in iOS Safari in production at scale. Hopefully, this is now mostly solved…
Android browsers support for WebRTC
Android has its own set of headaches when it comes to WebRTC. That's because there's no single Android out there, but rather a slew of them.
Here's what we can glean from a close look at that 'can I use' list above.
- Android Browser, Chrome for Android and Firefox for Android are the gold standard. If these are what your browsers 'bump' into, then you're in good shape
- Opera… it depends. Opera Mobile is just fine. Opera Mini doesn't support WebRTC
- UC Browser for Android has no WebRTC support
- Samsung Internet, quite the popular option you may run into, has WebRTC, but requires a webkit prefix. What does this mean? That it probably runs an old version of the WebRTC implementation, never a good thing with WebRTC
- QQ Browser and Baidu Browser, both the China alternatives to Chrome also have WebRTC support but also with a webkit prefix. Support there would also be tricky for web applications without some serious regression testing
While WebRTC is nicely supported in Android, it is going to be hard sometimes to decide what that support exactly means. Knowing that is a mix of understanding the device and the browser the web application is being executed on top.
Where do we go from here?
If you read everything until here, then understand this: WebRTC is a work in progress.
It is the best (and only) alternative you have for real time communications that works in the browser without any installation. It works well enough for large companies to release applications (web and native) that attract massive user bases.
Qq Browser For Pc
As with many other technologies, starting to use it is simple. Getting it to a professional level requires a lot more investment and commitment.
–
Next week I'll be starting off my 'future of WebRTC' workshop. This workshop is going to cover many aspects of the changing landscape of WebRTC. I'll be touching issues of infrastructure, optimization and differentiation. All with a view of the current best practices as well as the latest trends.
Qq Mobile Browser Extension
There are 2-3 more seats available in the workshop. If you are interested in joining, check here.